2 Comments
User's avatar
Calandra Mulder's avatar

Hi. I'm new to your subtack, relatively new to substack, for that matter. Perhaps somewhere else you've posted about what is still happening in the Ukraine. I know they haven't been accepted into NATO and wish NATO would find a way to open the door to them having an actual seat at the table. If they can and do, doesn't that mean your article doesn't even need to be here, or what am I missing? We need to step up to better supporting the Ukraine with out without the USA, obviously, but wouldn't that become moot if they were a member? My attitude is basically fuck Putin and Trump and the rest of the oily bunch who are trying to carve the globe up into three "easy" pieces -- before they ultimately turn on each other, because none of them want to share or even listen to their own countrymen.

Expand full comment
Mattppea's avatar

That is a really good question. If Ukraine had been in nato prior to 2014 then none of this would be necessary.

Unfortunately victor orban can block Ukraine from joining nato. So in the short term ukraine will have to use eu funding and uk partnership to develop its own technology. During the time of the ussr Ukraine was the military manufacturing powerhouse. Its why russia can't build new technology and is dependent on China and iran.

If the usa continues it's current path expect Ukraine to produce nuclear weapons.

Expand full comment